QNT vs XLM
Quant and Stellar compared on trend status, technical signal, hype risk and 90-day performance, QNT against XLM. Measurements only: this page does not rank QNT above XLM or the other way round.
Quant and Stellar are compared here measure by measure — size, turnover, momentum, trending reach and risk. They were paired under the "same category" rule rather than chosen by hand — QNT against XLM, rebuilt every night.
QNT leads on 10 of the 16 measures and XLM on 5. That count is not a recommendation to buy QNT or XLM: the measures pull in different directions, and a higher hype-risk score is a warning rather than a win.
Hype risk side by side
QNT against XLM, measure by measure
Rebuilt from the data on September 29, 2026
| Measure | QNT | XLM | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market capitalisation Larger is the bigger market | $3.23B | $8.06B | XLM |
| Market-cap rank Lower number is higher up | #38 | #20 | XLM |
| Price Not comparable without supply | $223.70 | $0.2304 | n/a |
| 24-hour volume Traded value in the last day | $1.08B | $821.2M | QNT |
| Volume / market cap Turnover relative to size | 0.334 | 0.102 | QNT |
| 24-hour change | -24.3% | +7.1% | XLM |
| 7-day change | +243.8% | +7.7% | QNT |
| 30-day change | +275.9% | +29.8% | QNT |
| 90-day change From daily closes | +255.7% | +22.9% | QNT |
| Trending position Today's global order | #5 | #11 | QNT |
| Countries trending in National feeds, 43 markets | 21 | 4 | QNT |
| Days on the list Consecutive days | 7 | 2 | QNT |
| Signal strength Share of checks passed | 80% | 90% | XLM |
| RSI (14) Above 70 is stretched | 76 | 68 | QNT |
| From 52-week high Closer to zero is nearer the peak | -19.4% | -43.1% | QNT |
| Hype risk Lower is calmer, not better | 44/100 | 16/100 | XLM |
What the numbers say
19 facts from today's collection
The two are 2.5x apart in market value, Stellar ahead with $8.06B versus $3.23B.
QNT holds market-cap rank 38 and XLM rank 20, 18 places apart.
$223.70 buys one QNT and $0.2304 one XLM — useful for order sizing, not for judging value.
$1.08B changed hands in Quant today, 1.3x the $821.2M recorded in Stellar.
Turnover tells a different story: QNT trades 33.4% of its market value each day, the other 10.2%.
On the 24 hours window the readings are -24.3% and +7.1% respectively, favouring XLM.
+243.8% for QNT over seven days, +7.7% for XLM — QNT ahead on this window by 236.1 points.
On the thirty days window the readings are +275.9% and +29.8% respectively, favouring QNT.
Ninety daily closes give QNT +255.7% and XLM +22.9%.
The pair appears together on the trending map, QNT at 5 (7 consecutive days) and XLM at 11 (2).
Geographic spread: 21 countries for QNT and 4 for XLM.
The daily model passes 80% of its checks on QNT and 90% on XLM, reading Strong buy and Strong buy.
The RSI readings are 76 and 68 respectively, putting QNT higher up the momentum scale.
Measured against their own 52-week peaks, Quant sits -19.4% below and Stellar -43.1% below.
QNT and XLM both trade above their own 200-day moving average, the simplest long-term filter in the model.
Hype risk is higher for Quant at 44/100 (Medium) than for Stellar at 16.
QNT and XLM share 1 CoinGecko category: Real-world assets.
Today's volume is 7.32 times normal for Quant and 2.38 times normal for Stellar.
The signal for QNT is built on 405 daily closes and the one for XLM on 409.
Last 90 daily closes
Each chart is scaled to its own range
Quant
Stellar
Questions about this pair
Answered from the same daily data
Which of QNT and XLM is trending today?
Both are on the trending list: QNT at position 5 and XLM at position 11. Trending on this site measures search and page-view interest in QNT and XLM, not price direction.
Is QNT bigger than XLM?
Stellar is larger, at $8.06B of market value against $3.23B — 2.5x the size.
What does the daily signal say about QNT and XLM?
The checklist reads Strong buy for QNT (80% of checks passed) and Strong buy for XLM (90%). The checklist is a mechanical count of trend and momentum conditions on QNT and XLM, not advice.
Which one carries more hype risk?
Quant scores 44/100 against 16 for Stellar. The score behind both the QNT and XLM figures combines recent price change, turnover, size, days on the list, RSI and exchange coverage.
Does this page say whether to buy QNT or XLM?
No. Every figure here measures one thing about QNT and XLM — size, turnover, momentum, trending reach, risk — and the measures often disagree. Nothing on this page is financial advice about QNT, XLM or any other coin, and none of it forecasts a price.