2026-09-25 UTC
☰ Menu
◆ September 25, 2026 · comparison

LIT vs QNT

Lighter and Quant compared on trend status, technical signal, hype risk and 90-day performance, LIT against QNT. Measurements only: this page does not rank LIT above QNT or the other way round.

LIT signalStrong buy
QNT signalStrong buy
LIT hype risk10/100
QNT hype risk38/100
Similar market value

A data comparison of Lighter against Quant. The rule that paired LIT with QNT is similar market value; the numbers come from the same daily collection as the rest of the site.

Across the table Lighter is ahead on 9 measures and Quant on 6. A measure count is a summary of today's LIT and QNT data, nothing more.

Hype risk side by side

7-day price change risk points, max 20LIT 0 · QNT 19LIT: +8.7% over the past week · QNT: +48.5% over the past week
Volume to market cap risk points, max 20LIT 0 · QNT 0LIT: 0.10 of market value traded in 24h · QNT: 0.03 of market value traded in 24h
Market capitalisation risk points, max 15LIT 0 · QNT 0LIT: $1.26B market cap · QNT: $1.30B market cap
Days on the trending list risk points, max 15LIT 0 · QNT 5LIT: 9 consecutive days · QNT: 3 consecutive days
RSI (14) risk points, max 15LIT 3 · QNT 14LIT: 64 — neutral range · QNT: 78 — overbought
Exchange coverage risk points, max 15LIT 7 · QNT 0LIT: Top 250 by market cap, not on Binance USDT · QNT: Traded on Binance against USDT

LIT against QNT, measure by measure

Rebuilt from the data on September 25, 2026

MeasureLITQNTAhead
Market capitalisation
Larger is the bigger market
$1.26B$1.30BQNT
Market-cap rank
Lower number is higher up
#72#71QNT
Price
Not comparable without supply
$5.05$89.18n/a
24-hour volume
Traded value in the last day
$125.6M$39.0MLIT
Volume / market cap
Turnover relative to size
0.1000.030LIT
24-hour change-5.8%+26.6%QNT
7-day change+8.7%+48.5%QNT
30-day change+53.6%+42.0%LIT
90-day change
From daily closes
+209.2%+32.9%LIT
Trending position
Today's global order
#19#44LIT
Countries trending in
National feeds, 43 markets
83LIT
Days on the list
Consecutive days
93LIT
Signal strength
Share of checks passed
83%90%QNT
RSI (14)
Above 70 is stretched
6478QNT
From 52-week high
Closer to zero is nearer the peak
-1.1%-15.5%LIT
Hype risk
Lower is calmer, not better
10/10038/100LIT

What the numbers say

19 facts from today's collection

The two are 1.0x apart in market value, Quant ahead with $1.30B versus $1.26B.

Lighter sits below Quant by 1 rank (72 vs 71).

Price per token: LIT $5.05, QNT $89.18. LIT and QNT do not share a supply schedule, so the market-cap row is the comparable one.

Daily turnover favours LIT: $125.6M traded versus $39.0M for QNT.

10.0% of LIT's market value traded in the last 24 hours, against 3.0% for QNT.

-5.8% for LIT over 24 hours, +26.6% for QNT — QNT ahead on this window by 32.4 points.

On the seven days window the readings are +8.7% and +48.5% respectively, favouring QNT.

+53.6% for LIT over thirty days, +42.0% for QNT — LIT ahead on this window by 11.6 points.

The 90-day comparison reads +209.2% for Lighter versus +32.9% for Quant, measured on daily closes.

Both are on the trending list today: LIT at position 19 after 9 day(s), QNT at 44 after 3.

Counting countries, LIT leads 8 to 3 over QNT — a wider footprint on the map.

Out of 6 and 10 valid checks, LIT clears 83% and QNT clears 90%.

On the 14-day RSI, Lighter reads 64 and Quant reads 78.

Distance from the yearly high is -1.1% for LIT and -15.5% for QNT.

In the LIT/QNT pair the 200-day check goes to both sides.

Hype risk is higher for Quant at 38/100 (Medium) than for Lighter at 10.

These are cross-sector neighbours rather than peers, LIT in DeFi and QNT in Real-world assets.

QNT shows the bigger volume spike of the pair at 3.29x its 20-day average.

Depth of data differs — 263 closes for LIT versus 401 for QNT — and short histories weaken the checklist.

Last 90 daily closes

Each chart is scaled to its own range

Lighter

Quant

Questions about this pair

Answered from the same daily data

Which of LIT and QNT is trending today?

Both are on the trending list: LIT at position 19 and QNT at position 44. Trending on this site measures search and page-view interest in LIT and QNT, not price direction.

Is LIT bigger than QNT?

Quant is larger, at $1.30B of market value against $1.26B — 1.0x the size.

What does the daily signal say about LIT and QNT?

The checklist reads Strong buy for LIT (83% of checks passed) and Strong buy for QNT (90%). The checklist is a mechanical count of trend and momentum conditions on LIT and QNT, not advice.

Which one carries more hype risk?

Quant scores 38/100 against 10 for Lighter. The score behind both the LIT and QNT figures combines recent price change, turnover, size, days on the list, RSI and exchange coverage.

Does this page say whether to buy LIT or QNT?

No. Every figure here measures one thing about LIT and QNT — size, turnover, momentum, trending reach, risk — and the measures often disagree. Nothing on this page is financial advice about LIT, QNT or any other coin, and none of it forecasts a price.